"Our remit was to look for innovative media outlets that are producing high-quality news, that are technologically innovative and that might actually survive financially. Accordingly, we spent three months interviewing media innovators around the world and reading what others have written on the subject. This report is divided into seven sections: 1) this introduction, 2) our main findings, 3) two sets of recommendations, one for the media development community and another set for people starting a media outlet, 4) an “Innovation Index” listing practices that we found around the world, 5) a description of our methodology, 6) a review of practitioner reports we read, 7) write-ups describing 35 media outlets, based on interviews we conducted ... We were inspired and encouraged by what we saw. All over the world, independent media outlets are innovating and overcoming obstacles. Globally, start-ups are demonstrating the drive to take risks for the sake of a good idea. The challenges facing these outlets—and the innovations employed to tackle them—broadly fall into four categories: editorial, business, distribution and security. Operating with agility, media start-ups are finding creative ways to gather and disseminate information. In India, Gram Vaani uses a mobile phone social network to connect the rural poor and circumvent legislative prohibitions on radio broadcasting. In Zimbabwe, The Source survives in the repressive media climate by focusing on business journalism. Oxpeckers in South Africa uses geomapping to report on rhino poaching. Crikey in Australia has built a successful business model based on soliciting tips and scandal from the same audience it reports on and Kenya’s African SkyCAM deploys drones to avoid negotiating with police for access to disaster zones ... Instead of finding a clear model for what works, we found confirmation of many things we knew or suspected. Independent media outlets vary in size, ambition and model. Few have fully succeeded, while many do one thing well, which typically reflects the founder’s particular strength—usually in journalism or technology ... Most media outlets we found are small, run by a few full-time staff supplemented by volunteers and freelancers, and supported by a combination of grants, donations and haphazard business endeavors. The leaders at most organizations we interviewed were motivated by a desire to produce high-quality journalism rather than meet particular financial or audience goals." (Executive summary, p.5-7)
Contents
1 Executive summary, 5
2 Main findings, 11
3 Recommendations, 22
4 Innovation index, 32
5 Methodology, 51
6 Literature review, 54
7 Case studies, 74
THE CONVERSATION – Australia, 75
CRIKEY – Australia, 80
DAILY MAVERICK – South Africa, 84
EYEWITNESS NEWS – South Africa, 88
NEWS TOOLS – South Africa, 92
OXPECKERS – South Africa, 95
INVESTIGATEWEST – USA, 98
NEWS DEEPLY – USA, 102
OCCRP - Bosnia and Herzegovina, 105
OJO PUBLICO – Peru, 111
RootIO – Uganda, 113
MASHALLAH NEWS – Lebanon, 120
Agência Pública – Brazil, 123
Jota – Brazil, 126
AFRICAN SKYCAM – Kenya, 130
iHUB – Kenya, 133
HIMAL SOUTHASIAN – Nepal, 136
THE WILL – Nigeria, 140
MINIVAN NEWS – Maldives, 143
INDIASPEND – India, 147
GRAM VAANI – India, 151
7iber – Jordan, 156
MALAYSIAKINI – Malaysia, 160
ANIMAL POLITICO – Mexico, 164
CHIAPAS PARALELO – Mexico, 167
EL DAILY POST – Mexico, 169
EMEEQUIS – Mexico, 173
HORIZONTAL – Mexico, 175
LadoB – Mexico, 178
LIBERACION – Mexico, 181
RIODOCE – Mexico, 185
SinEMBARGO – Mexico, 187
ECO-BUSINESS – Singapore, 190
MADA MASR – Egypt, 195
GUOKR – China, 198