Document detail

African Media Barometer: Mali 2021

Windhoek: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) (2021), 55 pp.
ISBN 978-99945-77-92-7 CC BY-NC-SA
Other Editions: also published in French
" ... the exercise of freedom of expression remains relatively practised and differs from one region to the next. It is easier to exercise freedom of expression in big cities than in small towns or rural areas. Since 2012, Mali has been plagued by terrorist groups’ attacks from the north. The deterioration of the security situation, which impacts all aspects of national life, causes a climate of self-censorship, especially among media professionals, most notably in the countryside. From Ségou (centre of Mali) to the far north, community radio stations are cautious with the terms they use. Journalists systematically refuse specific programmes for fear of being physically hurt or seeing their facilities attacked. Some journalists have been kidnapped, although most are released after secret negotiations involving state security. Threats and pressures on journalists and the media do not come only from state officials. People named in investigative articles sometimes use deceptive methods to intimidate journalists. People singled out by publications also put pressure on the family of journalists to get the investigation dropped or for journalists to self-censor. Furthermore, some laws restrict freedom of expression, such as Act of 5 December 2019 on the repression of cybercrime in its articles 74, 75 and 76 ..." (Summary, p.5)
Contents
Sector 1. Freedom of expression, including freedom of the media, is guaranteed in the constitution and protected by other laws, 9
Sector 2. The media landscape, including new media, is defined by its diversity, its independence and its sustainability, 25
Sector 3. The regulation on broadcasting is transparent and independent. The state broadcaster has evolved into a genuine public broadcaster, 37
Sector 4. The media implement high professional standards, 45
Follow-up questions, 53